Sign in │ Create Account

繁體中文 │ ENGLISH │ 简体中文

Home > Q&A

Dear member, World GreenMech Team is here for you to do online services, Please
sign in
and fill in your valuable comments in the form below and we will reply you as soon as possible. Thank You!
※ Please ask only one question at a time to avoid missing any answers or causing misunderstandings. Thank you for your cooperation!

New Brain2026/10/10 下午 10:56:29
GreenMech Junior – Science (GMJr-S)Reference: 2027 WGM Contest Regulations, Section 9.4.1.2 (Challenge 1: Logistics Supply), Rules 3 and 4Dear Organizer,We would like to clarify the following points regarding Challenge 1:1. Retrieving the vehicle before it fully crosses the Field: If a participant picks up the supply vehicle before it has completely crossed the Competition Field (i.e., before it passes the red line on the Receiving side), we understand that this transport attempt is not successful and the projectile does not score. Is this understanding correct? Is there any additional penalty beyond the lost attempt?2. Restart position after a failed attempt: When the vehicle does not complete the crossing, or the projectile falls off during transport, and the participant retrieves the vehicle to try again, must the vehicle be returned to the original Sending Area and released again before the red line? Or may it be restarted from the position where it stopped?3. Catching the vehicle in the Receiving Area: Once the vehicle has entered the Receiving Area with all four wheels touching the ground, may the participant pick it up while it is still moving? Or must the vehicle come to a complete stop first?Thank you so much!
1. Correct. It is considered an unsuccessful transport attempt. The vehicle and projectile may be retrieved to try again without stopping the timer. There are no additional point deductions or penalties. 2. If the vehicle fails to successfully cross the central track area, participants may retrieve it themselves to restart. If that run started from the Sending Area, it must return to the Sending Area to restart; if it started from the Receiving Area, it must return to the Receiving Area. 3. Once the vehicle body has completely crossed the boundary line, participants may pick it up—there is no need to wait for the vehicle to come to a complete stop.
2026/9/22 下午 04:22:46
In the designated stage task challenge, if the wheels of the car collide with the red round rod, will the team be unable to obtain the untouched score?
The red round rod is part of the target zone.
2026/9/21 下午 05:45:24
Indonesian participants are asking if using an elastic-powered car to transport ammunition in this way meets the switch mechanism specs: Video link: https://youtu.be/E8Oj8gfuIQM
Compliant. However, please ensure that it strictly adheres to Rule 9.4.1.1. 1) of the guidelines: 'Once the elastic force is set, the hand must be able to release completely before the vehicle is triggered to move forward via a switch mechanism.'
Richard Chou2026/9/21 下午 03:58:24
Regarding the 2027 World GreenMech R4M Basic rules, while Robot C is in the starting area prior to launch, are students allowed to manually arrange the feed inside the temporary storage zone?
When Robot C is preparing in the start zone (before pressing the start switch or device on the robot), participants may manually arrange the feed in the feed holding area with their bare hands, but placing feed into Robot C's start zone or onto the body of Robot C by hand is strictly prohibited.
Richard Chou2026/9/21 下午 03:55:51
Regarding the 2027 World GreenMech R4M Advanced rules: I know Robot C requires the Gigo controller, but are we allowed to use our own battery-compliant microcontrollers for Robots A, B, and the D automated platform?
"A/B Robots and D Automation Platform – Other Task Solutions Area There is no restriction on the control module; however, the control modules for the D Automation Platform – Car Entering the Parking Tower Area and the E Image Recognition Area must strictly adhere to Section 8.10.1: Main Controller Box and AI Recognition System Specifications."
洪哲倫2026/9/21 下午 03:30:16
"Regarding your association’s competition, I have a question and sincerely hope to receive your association’s response. In the competition guidelines, there is a requirement for the supervising teacher to confirm the originality of the work. Suppose that Team B (four competitors), under the guidance of the same teacher, uses a creative function from a work developed by Team A, which the teacher supervised in the previous year’s competition, and the structure, appearance, and presentation are highly similar. However, Team B did not obtain consent from the original team members (also four competitors, two of whom are members of Team B, but were not responsible for creating the original concept). In such a situation, can the organizer determine whether this constitutes an infringement of copyright or intellectual property rights? If Team B wins an award, how would the organizer handle the situation? Thank you."
"About Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and originality, here is the official policy from the World GreenMech Association: Originality and Permission: Teachers and advisors must make sure the team's work is original and does not copy anyone else. If a team uses specific ideas from past years or other members (not including basic science rules or public technology), they must get permission from the original creator first. Otherwise, it will not count as the new team's work. The Association does not make legal decisions; whether something is copied depends on real similarity and legal facts. Time Limit for Appeals: All competition complaints follow an ""on-site handling"" rule. If you have any problems with scores or think another team broke the rules, you must file a complaint before the official scores and rankings are announced. No complaints will be accepted after the results are out. Thank you for caring about fair competition and students' creative rights. Sincerely, World GreenMech Association"